Legal Consequences of Default in the Franchise Agreement Based on the Case Study (Decision of the Sukoharjo District Court Number 18/Pdt.G/2018/PN Skh)

Authors

  • Adelia Nindya Kirana Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Urbaniasi Urbaniasi Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i2.899

Keywords:

Legal Consequences, Default, Franchise

Abstract

Franchise, namely an agreement in which one party is given the right to utilize and use intellectual property rights owned by another party in return for a fee based on the terms and sale of goods and or services. This study aims to determine the legal consequences of one of the parties defaulting on the franchise agreement in Decision Number 18/Pdt.G/2018/PN Skh and to find out how to resolve disputes for the franchisor and franchisee in the event of a violation of the franchise agreement. To achieve this goal, the researcher uses normative juridical research, then this normative legal research is based on primary and secondary legal materials. In 2018, the Plaintiff has run the Pinky Guard franchise business, which will be opened in Manado with the defendant. After the plaintiff fulfilled his obligations by making a number of payments, the defendant apparently did not fulfill the plaintiff's rights. So because of this, the defendant can be said to have committed a default because he was unable to fulfill the obligations stipulated in the franchise agreement.

References

Adrian Sutedi, 2008, Hukum Waralaba, Bogor: Ghlia Indonesia, hal. 80-81.

Ahmadi Miru, Sakka Pati, Hukum Perikatan, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2008).

Amiruddin & Zainal asikin, pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, 2012, Raja Grafindo Persada Jakarta.

Bambang N. Rachmadi, 2007, Franchising The Most Practicial and Excellent Way Of Succeding, Cetakan Kedua, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.

Gunawan Widjaja, Lisensi atau Waralaba, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2002.

Henry Campbel, Black’s Law Dictionary, St. Paul Publishing, 1979. Pasal 1 ayat (1) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 42 Tahun 2007 tentang waralaba.

Joseph Mancuso & Donald Boroian, 1995, Pedoman Membeli dan Mengelola franchise, PT. Delapratasa, Jakarta.

Soeryono Soekarto, pengantar penelitian hukum, Jakarta:UI Press, 1984.

Subekti, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, (Jakarta: PT. Arga Printing, 2007).

Suharnoko, Hukum Perjanjian: Teori dan Analisa Kasus, Cet. 1, Kencana, Jakarta, 2004.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-01

How to Cite

Kirana, A. N., & Urbaniasi, U. (2023). Legal Consequences of Default in the Franchise Agreement Based on the Case Study (Decision of the Sukoharjo District Court Number 18/Pdt.G/2018/PN Skh). QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(2), 1100–1106. https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i2.899

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December 2023

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).