Lawsuit Regarding Sale and Purchase (Case Study Against PT Antam and Budi Said Crazy Rich Surabaya)

Authors

  • Edmund Lo Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Gunardi Lie Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i2.831

Keywords:

Lawsuits, Sales and Purchase Agreements, Third Parties, and Liability

Abstract

Buying and selling is an activity that is carried out by many people, but in the transaction process it must be carried out with the consent of both parties, so that the sale and purchase is only valid according to law. This can also be interpreted in the buying and selling of gold between Budi Said as the buyer and also PT Antam as the gold provider. However, the problem was that when PT Antam employees sent gold to Budi Said, it was explained that the gold received was not in accordance with the weight agreed upon at the beginning. This made Budi Said file a lawsuit against PT Antam for the discrepancy between the gold he received and the amount agreed upon and promised together. The lawsuit was accepted by PT Antam for violating the law, even though clarification should have been made and employees were also responsible. If we look at it from the other side, then when Budi bought gold from PT Antam which he promised, namely through Eksi who was one of PT Antam's employees, this was explained by PT Antam that they had never sold gold below the price set in the company profile. , but in fact the agreement made by Eksi with Budi was far below the normal price or that explained by PT Antam.

References

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2017. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. (Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijke Wetboek voor Indonesie).

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2014. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 158/Pdt.G/2020/PN-Sby.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 39. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4279.

Yudha, Agus. 2010. Kuliah Teori-Teori Tanggung Jawab Hukum dan Tanggung Gugat, tanggal 25 Oktober 2010, Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Airlangga.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-01

How to Cite

Lo, E., Lie, G., & Syailendra Putra, M. R. (2023). Lawsuit Regarding Sale and Purchase (Case Study Against PT Antam and Budi Said Crazy Rich Surabaya). QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(2), 923–928. https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i2.831

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December 2023

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).