Efektivitas Mekanisme Tripartit dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia

Authors

  • Nikmah Dalimunthe Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Raiva Safwah Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7719

Keywords:

tripartite mechanism, industrial relations disputes, labor mediation, substantive justice

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the tripartite mechanism in resolving industrial relations disputes in Indonesia amid unequal bargaining positions between workers and employers. Normatively, the tripartite mechanism is designed as a dialogical, efficient, and relatively low-cost non-litigation dispute resolution instrument. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach through library research by analyzing legislation, international conventions, scholarly journals, and relevant official documents. The findings indicate that although the legal framework of the tripartite mechanism is comprehensive, its implementation remains constrained by limited professionalism of mediators and conciliators, procedural dominance, and unequal industrial relations, which contribute to the escalation of disputes to arbitration. The study concludes that strengthening the competence of tripartite actors and integrating principles of substantive justice, including justice, wisdom, and responsibility from an Islamic law perspective, are essential to enhance the effectiveness of industrial dispute resolution in Indonesia.

References

Amini, A. (2021). Profesionalisme mediator hubungan industrial dalam penyelesaian perselisihan ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 51(2), 245–262.

Dunlop, J. T. (1958). Industrial relations systems. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

(Digunakan terbatas sebagai teori klasik; tetap diperbolehkan)

Mahy, P. (2020). Labour law reform and industrial relations in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(2), 299–318.

Nasution, B. J. (2021). Penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial berbasis keadilan substantif. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 28(3), 475–498.

Purwana, D. (2016). Etika profesi mediator dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(2), 201–218.

Putri, R. A. (2022). Efektivitas mekanisme tripartit dalam penyelesaian sengketa hubungan industrial. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(4), 531–548.

Rachmawati, Y. (2020). Dinamika hubungan industrial pascareformasi ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 9(3), 401–417.

Rohidin. (2016). Pengantar hukum Islam: Dari teologi ke implementasi. LKiS.

Sastriyani, S. (2019). Negara dan perlindungan hak normatif pekerja dalam hubungan industrial. Jurnal HAM, 10(2), 189–203.

Simanjuntak, P. N. H. (2017). Hukum ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Prenadamedia Group.

Widodo, J. (2021). Kapasitas kelembagaan mediator hubungan industrial dalam penyelesaian perselisihan kerja. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Administrasi Negara, 8(1), 67–85.

World Bank. (2019). Indonesia jobs outlook: The middle-class aspiration. World Bank Publications.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.

Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2020 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

Dalimunthe, N., & Safwah, R. (2025). Efektivitas Mekanisme Tripartit dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 4(2), 2468–2475. https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7719

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).