Peran Metode Pembuktian dalam Pengembangan Pemikiran Kritis Mahasiswa Matematika

Authors

  • Beatrix Chatarina Da Gomes Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Aline Theresia Girsang Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Cindy Christina Br Bukit Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Fakhirah Musyaffa Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Fatiha Aini Rahayu Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7283

Keywords:

proof methods, critical thinking, mathematics students, logic, mathematics education

Abstract

Population growth becomes an essential element in mathematics education, not only strengthening conceptual understanding but also developing students’ critical thinking skills. This study discusses the role of proof methods in enhancing analytical, evaluative, and synthetic abilities among mathematics students. Through literature review and conceptual analysis, it was found that mathematical proof encourages students to question assumptions, identify logical errors, and construct strong arguments. The results show that integrating proof methods into the curriculum can improve critical thinking skills by 30–40% based on empirical studies. Recommendations include implementing problem-based and collaborative teaching approaches to maximize these benefits

References

Alcock, L., & Weber, K. (2005). Proof validation in real analysis: Inferring and checking warrants. Journal of Mathematical Bahavior, 24(2), 125–134.

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking. Midwest Publications.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking:An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities (pp. 1–18). University of Illinois.

Ficione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (1st ed., pp. 1–122). American Philosophical Association (APA).

Hernadi, J. (2021). Fondasi Matematika dan Metode Pembuktian. Erlangga.

Mathematics, N. C. of T. of. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Moore, R. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(3), 249–266.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking:Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life (2nd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Salden, A., & Salden, J. (2003). Validation of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics, 34(1), 4–36.

Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. (2009). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 314–352.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02

How to Cite

Gomes, B. C. D., Girsang, A. T., Bukit, C. C. B., Musyaffa, F., & Rahayu, F. A. (2025). Peran Metode Pembuktian dalam Pengembangan Pemikiran Kritis Mahasiswa Matematika. QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 4(2), 1349–1355. https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7283

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).