Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum oleh Ahli Waris Dalam Pinjam-Meminjam Uang yang Akan Digunakan Untuk Investasi Penitipan dan Bisnis Beras (Studi Putusan Nomor: 222/Pdt.G/2022/PN TJK)

(1) * Erlina Bachri Mail (Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia)
(2) Intan Nurina Seftiniara Mail (Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia)
(3) Saniyya Fadhilah Agustine Mail (Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


Lending and borrowing can be done through an agreement between the borrower and the lender in the form of an agreement. The loan agreement can be in the form of money or goods with an agreement to replace the amount of the same value as the loan. However, many violate this agreement, resulting in losses for one of the parties. This loss is the basis for the cause of Unlawful Acts. Factors Causing Unlawful Acts in Loan Agreements Based on Decision Number: 222/Pdt.G/2022/PN TJK are: First, the existence of bad intentions or bad faith from one of the parties; Second, negligence (culpa) or deliberate action (dolus) by Iwan Palera Rindas; and Third, the trust factor where the Plaintiff was willing to lend such a large amount of money because of his personal relationship with the late Iwan Palera Rindas, whom he trusted like family. The Judge's Consideration of the Unlawful Acts in the Loan Agreement Based on Decision Number 222/Pdt.G/2022/PN TJK was correct and proper because it considered three legal aspects: first, Juridical Consideration, in this case Article 1100 of the Civil Code and Article 1365 of the Civil Code as the legal basis for the lawsuit; second, Philosophical Consideration, which considered the Plaintiff's ability to prove a legal relationship between the Plaintiff and the heirs of the late Iwan Palera Rindas, who were entrusted with money for the rice business; and third, Sociological Consideration, namely that the Defendants had not fulfilled their obligations as heirs of the late Iwan Palera Rindas by failing to return the Plaintiff's money amounting to Rp2,496,000,000.00 (two billion four hundred ninety-six million Rupiah).


Keywords


Judge's Consideration; Unlawful Act; Heirs; Lending and Borrowing Money.

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v4i2.6789
      

Article metrics

10.57235/qistina.v4i2.6789 Abstract views : 0 | PDF views : 0

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


Adi dan I Ketut Westra. 2017. Kecakapan Berdasarkan Batasan Usia Dalam Membuat Perjanjian Dihadapan Notari. Kertha Semaya.

Farid, R. N., Zainudin Hasan. 2022. Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan Terhadap Karyawan Toko Erafone Megastore Cabang Mall Kartini Bandar Lampung (Studi Putusan Nomor 569/Pid. B/2021/Pn Tjk). Journal Of Social Science Research, Vo.2 No.1.

H. Zaeni Asyhadie. 2018. Hukum Keperdataan. PT. RajaGrafindo, Depok.

Ni Made Ayu Pratiwi. I Nyoman Putu Budiartha. Ni Komang Arini Styawati. Mei 2021. Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Pinjam-Meminjam Uang Yang Dinyatakan Batal Demi Hukum. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum. Vol 2. No 2.

R. Subekti. 1996. Hukum Perjanjian. PT. Intermasa, Jakarta.

Rosa Agustina. 2003. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Tami Rusli. 2012. Hukum Perjanjian yang Berkembang di Indonesia, Anugrah. Utama Raharja (Aura) Printing & Publishing, Bandar Lampung.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Erlina Bachri, Intan Nurina Seftiniara, Saniyya Fadhilah Agustine

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.