Criminal Sanctions by Judges Against Perpetrators of Criminal Acts Who Received Briberies Committed by Civil Servants (Decision Study Number: 17/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN TJK)

Authors

  • Aliffia Dewi Febrianti Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • Bambang Hartono Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • Zainudin Hasan Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2089

Keywords:

Criminal Sanctions, Bribery Crime, Civil Servants

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenon of criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia, with a focus on acts of bribery committed by Civil Servants (PNS), especially in certain cases in the City of Bandar Lampung. Corruption is considered a serious problem that affects all levels of society and has a detrimental impact on the country's progress. This research tries to analyze the factors that cause criminal acts of corruption, such as low salaries, systemic corruption, dissatisfaction and a culture of bribery. By using normative juridical research methods, this research also evaluates the judge's considerations in handing down decisions against perpetrators of criminal acts of accepting bribes. Judges are expected to be able to consider juridical aspects, such as evidence and charges, as well as non-juridical factors, such as justice, legal certainty and the benefit of society. This research reveals that preventing and dealing with the crime of accepting bribes needs to involve serious efforts in improving institutional structures, increasing transparency, strengthening supervision, and increasing integrity and ethics in public services. Collaborative efforts between government, civil society and the private sector are considered essential to create an environment free of corruption. The research results also highlight the importance of judges' careful and fair consideration in handing down decisions. Judges must consider juridical and non-juridical factors to ensure that the decisions taken are in accordance with the law, fair, and provide legal certainty to the community.

References

Anas Salahudin, 2018, Pendidikan Anti Korupsi, Bandung, Pustaka Setia.

Barda Nawawi Arief. 2013. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponogoro, Semarang.

Budiarjo, Miriam, 2010, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Danu Surya Putra & Rehnalemken Ginting. 2018. Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Bebas Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Tunjangan Penghasilan Aparat Pemerintah Desa Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan. Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Vol. 7, No. 2.

Darwan Prinst. 2002. Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Citra Aditya, Jakarta.

Dian Natasha, Setiyono Setiyono. 2022. Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menerima Uang Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti. Vol. 4 No. 3.

https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/jejak-pemberantasan/5-uu-46-tahun-2009-pengadilan-tindak-pidana-korupsi diakses pada tanggal 02 Oktober 2023 Pukul 21.00 WIB

https://www.jogloabang.com/pustaka/uu-46-2009-pengadilan-tipikor diakses pada tanggal 02 Oktober 2023 Pukul 20.33

Mien Rukmini. 2010. Aspek Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, Alumni, Bandung.

Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, UI-Pers, 2019.

Sulardi Sulardi & Yohana Puspitasari Wardoyo. 2015. Kepastian Hukum, Kemanfaatan, dan Keadilan terhadap Perkara Pidana Anak: Kajian Putusan Nomor 201/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Blt. Jurnal Yudisial, Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Vol. 8, No. 3.

Suradi, Korupsi dalam Sektor Pemerintahan dan Swasta, Yogyakarta, Gava Media, 2006.

Teguh Sulista dan Aria Zurnetti. 2011. Hukum Pidana:Horizon Baru Pasca Reformasi, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Zainudin Hasan. 2018. Implikasi Pengembalian Keuangan Negara Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Bantuan Program Nasional Pembangunan Masyarakat Mandiri Pedesaan Di Provinsi Lampung, Keadilan Progresif, Volum 9, Nomor 2.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-01

How to Cite

Febrianti, A. D., Hartono, B., & Hasan, Z. (2024). Criminal Sanctions by Judges Against Perpetrators of Criminal Acts Who Received Briberies Committed by Civil Servants (Decision Study Number: 17/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN TJK). QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 3(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2089

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): June 2024

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).