Peran Literasi Kritis Dalam Meningkatkan Pemikiran Kritis Mahasiswa

Authors

  • Gladys Sintia Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Siti Nur Alfath Ali Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Sri Hartati Lombu Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • M Joharis Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v3i1.5828

Keywords:

Literasi kritis, Pemikiran kritis, Mahasiswa

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi peran literasi kritis dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa. Penelitian ini menyelidiki peran literasi kritis dalam mengembangkan pemikiran kritis mahasiswa di era digital, dengan fokus pada kemampuan analisis informasi. Menggunakan pendekatan mixed methods, data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner daring (Google Form) terhadap 135 mahasiswa multidisiplin dari beberapa kampus   (UNIMED, USM-Indonesia, UNIAS, ITERA, UPR, dll.) dan wawancara mendalam dengan mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia UNIMED. Temuan kuantitatif mengungkap bahwa: (1) 85 responden (63%) sering menggunakan literasi kritis dalam tugas akademik, namun 63 responden (47%) masih kesulitan membedakan fakta dan opini; (2) hanya 19 responden (14%) yang rutin memverifikasi informasi melalui jurnal akademik. Data kualitatif dari wawancara memperlihatkan bahwa ketergantungan pada media sosial dan minimnya kebiasaan membaca sumber kredibel menjadi penghambat utama. Analisis tematik mengidentifikasi tiga masalah kritis: (a) dominasi media sosial sebagai sumber informasi tidak terverifikasi, (b) rendahnya kemampuan identifikasi bias dalam teks, dan (c) kurangnya praktik menulis analitis. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penguatan literasi kritis memerlukan intervensi terstruktur melalui: (1) integrasi modul literasi digital dalam kurikulum, (2) pelatihan analisis wacana kritis bagi dosen, dan (3) pengembangan komunitas baca kritis di kalangan mahasiswa. Temuan ini memberikan kontribusi penting bagi pengembangan model pembelajaran literasi di perguruan tinggi, khususnya dalam menghadapi tantangan misinformasi digital.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain.1 David McKay Company.

Cooper, P. A., & White, R. E. (2008). The power of critical literacy in the classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(6), 438-447.

Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century.2 MIT press.

Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Libraries Unlimited.

Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Cammack, D. W. (2013). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. Unrau & D. Alvermann (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1570-1612). International Reading Association.

Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Theory, policy, practice. Journal of curriculum studies, 44(2), 229-238.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2009). The thinker's guide to analytic thinking. Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.

Priyatni, E. T. (2012). Desain pembelajaran membaca kritis di sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 12(1), 1-10.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Sintia, G., Ali, S. N. A., Lombu, S. H., & Joharis, M. (2025). Peran Literasi Kritis Dalam Meningkatkan Pemikiran Kritis Mahasiswa. Journal of Law, Education and Business, 3(1), 464–469. https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v3i1.5828

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): April 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to JLEB: Journal of Law Education and Business Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to JLEB: Journal of Law Education and Business a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.