Implementasi Kebijakan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Wilayah Hukum Polres Morowali Utara

Authors

  • Theodorus Risupal Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
  • Syahruddin Hattab Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
  • Nasir Mangngasing Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v3i2.7596

Keywords:

Policy, Juvenile Criminal Justice System, Communication, Resources, Disposition, Bureaucratic Structure

Abstract

This study aims to determine the implementation of Juvenile Criminal Justice System Policy in the Jurisdiction of the North Morowali Police Department. This study uses qualitative data collection methods. The research location is at the North Morowali Police Department Office. The theory used in this study is the theory put forward by George C. Edward III. Nine informants participated in this study. Data were obtained from observations, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis methods include data collection, data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawing/verification. The results of the study on the Implementation of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Policy in the North Morowali Police jurisdiction indicate that its implementation has not been optimal. The four main aspects of policy implementation communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure show varying results. The communication aspect is considered quite good, as coordination between law enforcement officers and related agencies in handling juvenile cases has begun to be established, although there are still obstacles in the delivery of information and understanding of the policy at the implementing level. The resource aspect is considered less good, due to the still limited number and competence of officers with specific understanding of the juvenile criminal justice system, as well as the lack of supporting facilities and infrastructure such as special rooms for examining children or psychological assistance. The disposition aspect is also not good, as evidenced by the still weak commitment, attitude, and integrity of some officers in prioritizing the principles of restorative justice over a repressive approach. Meanwhile, the bureaucratic structure aspect is considered quite good, because there are already mechanisms and SOPs for handling juveniles that are clearly regulated, but still requires improvement in cross-agency coordination and consistency of implementation in the field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BUKU

Abdul Wahab, Solichin. Analisis Kebijakan: Dari Formulasi ke Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Negara. 2005.

Agustino, Leo. Dasar-Dasar Kebijakan Publik. 2006.

Edwards, George C., III. Implementing Public Policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1980.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. 2011.

Wahab, Solichin Abdul. Analisis Kebijakan: Dari Formulasi ke Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. 2010.

DOKUMEN

Indonesia. Keputusan Presiden Nomor 36 Tahun 1990 tentang Pengesahan Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1979 tentang Kesejahteraan Anak.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 tentang Pengadilan Anak.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 28B ayat (2).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02

How to Cite

Risupal, T., Hattab, S., & Mangngasing, N. (2025). Implementasi Kebijakan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Wilayah Hukum Polres Morowali Utara. Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary, 3(2), 1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v3i2.7596

Citation Check