Kewenangan Presiden dalam Keadaan Darurat: Kajian Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara

Authors

  • Farrel Nouvaleo Akbar Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Christine S T Kansil Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v2i2.4321

Keywords:

Kewenangan Presiden, Keadaan Darurat, Hukum Tata Negara, Pandemi COVID-19, Pengawasan, Demokrasi, Indonesia

Abstract

Kewenangan presiden dalam keadaan darurat merupakan aspek penting dalam hukum tata negara Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar hukum, batasan, serta penerapan kewenangan presiden selama keadaan darurat, dengan fokus pada pandemi COVID-19 sebagai studi kasus. Dasar hukum kewenangan presiden dalam keadaan darurat diatur oleh UUD 1945 Pasal 12, Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 1959 tentang Keadaan Bahaya, serta Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan. Meskipun presiden memiliki kewenangan luas, tindakan yang diambil tetap harus diawasi oleh lembaga-lembaga negara seperti Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) guna memastikan sesuai dengan prinsip negara hukum dan demokrasi. Penelitian ini juga membandingkan kewenangan presiden dalam keadaan darurat di Indonesia dengan negara-negara lain, seperti Amerika Serikat, Prancis, India, dan Jerman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan presiden selama pandemi COVID-19 telah sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum tata negara, meskipun terdapat beberapa kritik terkait pengawasan legislatif yang kurang optimal. Reformasi dalam undang-undang darurat dan penguatan mekanisme pengawasan diperlukan untuk memastikan transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam pelaksanaan kewenangan darurat di masa depan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Hukum Tata Negara Darurat. Rajawali Pers.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Perihal Undang-Undang: Proses dan Teknik Pembentukannya. Rajawali Pers.

Bell, J. (2008). French Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press.

Ferejohn, J., & Pasquino, P. (2004). The law of the exception: A typology of emergency powers. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(2), 210-239.

Ginsburg, T., & Versteeg, M. (2020). The Boundaries of Executive Power in the Pandemic. Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2020-52.

Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. Penguin Classics.

Kingsbury, D. (2007). Peace in Aceh: A personal account of the Helsinki peace process. Equinox Publishing.

Kommers, D. P., & Miller, R. A. (2012). The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Duke University Press.

Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. Crown Publishing.

Montesquieu, C. (1748). The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge University Press.

Sathe, S. P. (2002). Judicial Activism in India: Transgressing Borders and Enforcing Limits. Oxford University Press.

Schmitt, C. (1934). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. University of Chicago Press.

United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 1959 tentang Keadaan Bahaya.

Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan.

Undang-Undang No. 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 37/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Huda, N. (2020). Pembatasan Kewenangan Eksekutif di Indonesia: Telaah Konstitusi dalam Situasi Darurat. Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 12(1), 45-56.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30

How to Cite

Akbar, F. N., & Kansil, C. S. T. (2024). Kewenangan Presiden dalam Keadaan Darurat: Kajian Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara. Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary, 2(2), 1379–1389. https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v2i2.4321

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Desember 2024

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to JERUMI: Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to JERUMI: Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.