Tinjauan Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Pencurian dengan Pemberatan (Studi Putusan No. 702/Pid.B/2025/PN Tjk)

Authors

  • Benny Karya Limantara Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • Dharma Laury Putra Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v5i1.7860

Keywords:

Criminal Liability, Aggravated Theft, Judicial Consideration

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of perpetrators of aggravated theft and the judicial considerations applied in Decision of the Tanjungkarang District Court Number 702/Pid.B/2025/PN Tjk. The research focuses on the application of Article 363 of the Indonesian Criminal Code, the form of criminal responsibility imposed on the offender, and its conformity with the principles of justice and proportionality. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches, supported by library research. The findings indicate that the defendant’s conduct fulfills the elements of actus reus and mens rea, thereby justifying criminal liability. However, the sentence imposed is relatively lenient compared to the maximum penalty prescribed under Article 363 of the Criminal Code, raising concerns regarding the consistent application of the principle of proportionality. This study is expected to contribute to the development of criminal law, particularly in strengthening judicial consistency in adjudicating cases of aggravated theft.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chazawi, Adami. (2011). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 1. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Karyalimantara, Benny. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Lamintang, P.A.F. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Marpaung, Leden. (2010). Asas-Teori-Praktik Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Moeljatno. (2015). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Muladi & Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2010). Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tanjungkarang Nomor 702/Pid.B/2025/PN Tjk.

Sudarto. (2013). Hukum Pidana I. Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto Fakultas Hukum Undip.

Suteki & Galang Taufani. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.