Ethical Discourse on Artificial Intelligence in Media Reporting A Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/arrumman.v3i1.8560Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, AI Ethics, Media Discourse, Lived Experience, Digital Literacy, Media Framing, Identity Construction, Artificial Intelligence DiscourseAbstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) within the digital media landscape has generated increasingly complex ethical discourses, not only at the level of policy and institutional frameworks but also within the everyday experiences of users. This phenomenon is significant as media functions not merely as a channel of information, but as a powerful force shaping how individuals interpret, experience, and negotiate the meaning of technology in social life. This study aims to explore how ethical discourses surrounding AI in media coverage are interpreted through individuals’ subjective experiences. Employing a qualitative approach with an interpretative phenomenological design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, digital observation, and document analysis involving ten participants who are active social media users. Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis integrated with a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) perspective. The findings reveal three central patterns: ethical ambivalence between convenience and anxiety, tensions between media framing and personal experience, and the negotiation of identity and self-value in the context of AI advancement. These results indicate that AI ethics is not merely understood as a normative construct, but as a lived and dynamic experience shaped by contradictions and ongoing meaning-making processes. Theoretically, this study extends CDA by incorporating the dimension of subjective experience into discourse analysis. Practically, it offers implications for strengthening critical digital literacy, developing more context-sensitive policies, and designing educational frameworks that are responsive to the ethical challenges of emerging technologies. Furthermore, this study opens new avenues for exploring the interconnections between technology, discourse, and identity formation in the digital era.
Downloads
References
Bar-Gil, O. (2025). Examining trends in AI ethics across countries and institutions via quantitative discourse analysis. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02673-4
Breazu, P., & Katsos, N. (2024). AI-generated narratives and discourse: Implications for communication and society. Discourse & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265241251479
Cabanillas-García, J. L., & Sánchez-Gómez, M. C. (2025). Voices of researchers: Ethics and artificial intelligence in qualitative inquiry. Information, 16(11), 938. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/16/11/938
Elmholdt, K. T., Haahr, L., & Hansen, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence discourse: Hopes and fears in public narratives. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02214-z
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., … Vayena, E. (2022). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 32(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09584-8
Jaballah, N. L. (2026). Mapping the discursive landscape: A critical discourse analysis of AI perspectives in Irish journals. In Artificial Intelligence and Discourse (pp. xx–xx). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06408-0_8
Kopf, S. (2026). Social media critical discourse studies: Contemporary perspectives. Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2025.2463622
Li, Y., Yu, D., & Yu, L. (2026). Navigating artificial intelligence narratives in media discourse. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqag004
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Mutanana, N., & Shoko, C. T. (2026). Enhancing quality in qualitative research: Methodological reflections. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069261432368
Nguyen, D., & Hekman, E. (2024). The news framing of artificial intelligence: A critical analysis. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01511-1
Paganoni, M. C., & Becerra, G. (2026). Reframing datafication: News media discourses on big data and artificial intelligence. International Journal of Communication, 20, 1–20. https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/1213975
Paulus, T., Lester, J. N., & Dempster, P. (2025). Generative AI in qualitative research: Opportunities and challenges. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02488-3
Qiu, K., Bubenhofer, N., & Hackel, T. (2026). Decoding AI discourse: Media representations using computational methods. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf143
Svitych, O. (2026). Blind transparency: A critical discourse analysis of the EU AI Act. Critical Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2025.2496193
Zamani, E., & Rousaki, A. (2026). Risk, artificial intelligence, and governance: A critical discourse perspective. Information Technology for Development, 32(1). https://aisel.aisnet.org/itd/vol32/iss1/2/
Zeng, J., Schäfer, M. S., & Allgaier, J. (2026). Studying the discursive order of artificial intelligence. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261429196
Zottola, A., & Conoscenti, M. (2026). Of humans and AI: A critical discourse analysis of interactions. In Artificial Intelligence and Discourse (pp. xx–xx). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-07761-5_6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nadya Hafizah Harahap, Ridha Khairani, Muhammad Hilmy Zhafran, Muhammad Natsir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
- Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AR RUMMAN: Journal of Education and Learning Evaluation Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
- Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AR RUMMAN: Journal of Education and Learning Evaluation a Publisher of the manuscript.
- Authors reserve the following:
- all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights;
- the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
- use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
- voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.












