Ethical Discourse on Artificial Intelligence in Media Reporting A Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) Approach

Authors

  • Nadya Hafizah Harahap Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Ridha Khairani Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Hilmy Zhafran Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Natsir Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/arrumman.v3i1.8560

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, AI Ethics, Media Discourse, Lived Experience, Digital Literacy, Media Framing, Identity Construction, Artificial Intelligence Discourse

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) within the digital media landscape has generated increasingly complex ethical discourses, not only at the level of policy and institutional frameworks but also within the everyday experiences of users. This phenomenon is significant as media functions not merely as a channel of information, but as a powerful force shaping how individuals interpret, experience, and negotiate the meaning of technology in social life. This study aims to explore how ethical discourses surrounding AI in media coverage are interpreted through individuals’ subjective experiences. Employing a qualitative approach with an interpretative phenomenological design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, digital observation, and document analysis involving ten participants who are active social media users. Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis integrated with a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) perspective. The findings reveal three central patterns: ethical ambivalence between convenience and anxiety, tensions between media framing and personal experience, and the negotiation of identity and self-value in the context of AI advancement. These results indicate that AI ethics is not merely understood as a normative construct, but as a lived and dynamic experience shaped by contradictions and ongoing meaning-making processes. Theoretically, this study extends CDA by incorporating the dimension of subjective experience into discourse analysis. Practically, it offers implications for strengthening critical digital literacy, developing more context-sensitive policies, and designing educational frameworks that are responsive to the ethical challenges of emerging technologies. Furthermore, this study opens new avenues for exploring the interconnections between technology, discourse, and identity formation in the digital era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bar-Gil, O. (2025). Examining trends in AI ethics across countries and institutions via quantitative discourse analysis. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02673-4

Breazu, P., & Katsos, N. (2024). AI-generated narratives and discourse: Implications for communication and society. Discourse & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265241251479

Cabanillas-García, J. L., & Sánchez-Gómez, M. C. (2025). Voices of researchers: Ethics and artificial intelligence in qualitative inquiry. Information, 16(11), 938. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/16/11/938

Elmholdt, K. T., Haahr, L., & Hansen, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence discourse: Hopes and fears in public narratives. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02214-z

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., … Vayena, E. (2022). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 32(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09584-8

Jaballah, N. L. (2026). Mapping the discursive landscape: A critical discourse analysis of AI perspectives in Irish journals. In Artificial Intelligence and Discourse (pp. xx–xx). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06408-0_8

Kopf, S. (2026). Social media critical discourse studies: Contemporary perspectives. Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2025.2463622

Li, Y., Yu, D., & Yu, L. (2026). Navigating artificial intelligence narratives in media discourse. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqag004

Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Mutanana, N., & Shoko, C. T. (2026). Enhancing quality in qualitative research: Methodological reflections. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069261432368

Nguyen, D., & Hekman, E. (2024). The news framing of artificial intelligence: A critical analysis. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01511-1

Paganoni, M. C., & Becerra, G. (2026). Reframing datafication: News media discourses on big data and artificial intelligence. International Journal of Communication, 20, 1–20. https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/1213975

Paulus, T., Lester, J. N., & Dempster, P. (2025). Generative AI in qualitative research: Opportunities and challenges. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02488-3

Qiu, K., Bubenhofer, N., & Hackel, T. (2026). Decoding AI discourse: Media representations using computational methods. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf143

Svitych, O. (2026). Blind transparency: A critical discourse analysis of the EU AI Act. Critical Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2025.2496193

Zamani, E., & Rousaki, A. (2026). Risk, artificial intelligence, and governance: A critical discourse perspective. Information Technology for Development, 32(1). https://aisel.aisnet.org/itd/vol32/iss1/2/

Zeng, J., Schäfer, M. S., & Allgaier, J. (2026). Studying the discursive order of artificial intelligence. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261429196

Zottola, A., & Conoscenti, M. (2026). Of humans and AI: A critical discourse analysis of interactions. In Artificial Intelligence and Discourse (pp. xx–xx). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-07761-5_6

Downloads

Published

2026-06-12

How to Cite

Nadya Hafizah Harahap, Ridha Khairani, Muhammad Hilmy Zhafran, & Muhammad Natsir. (2026). Ethical Discourse on Artificial Intelligence in Media Reporting A Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) Approach. AR-RUMMAN: Journal of Education and Learning Evaluation, 3(1), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.57235/arrumman.v3i1.8560

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check