Juridical Analysis of Termination of Investigation of the Crime of Signature Forgery (Case Study at Barelang Police)

Authors

  • Raja Inal Akbar Siregar Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Soerya Respationo Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Erniyanti Erniyanti Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Dahlan Dahlan Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Ramlan Ramlan Universitas Batam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v3i1.1391

Keywords:

Investigator, Signature Forgery, Crime, Barelang Police

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to understand the legal regulation of signature forgery by the investigators of Polresta Barelang Police, observe the implementation of signature forgery by these investigators, and ascertain the legal basis for the termination of investigations into signature forgery cases. The results shows that the legal basis for terminating investigations into signature forgery cases is regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure (UUPA) in Indonesia. While investigators have worked with professionalism and integrity, many cases come to a halt after the suspect is declared unfit to be held accountable. There is a gap in handling cases involving suspects who are unable to be held accountable, leading to discrepancies with legal regulations and principles of criminal law.It's essential for the authorities to establish a clear definition of individuals unable to be held accountable for their actions and precise provisions for handling such criminal offenders. Additionally, reasons for criminal removal should be included as criteria for the termination of investigations. The police force should create guidelines for conducting investigations that adhere to legal procedures and carry out their responsibilities dutifully.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku pedoman penyusunan proposal dan tesis program megister ilmu hukum pasca sarjana uniba.

Idham, “Bahan Ajar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum”, Perkuliahan Pada Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum-UNIBA, Batam

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka)

Rosady Ruslan, “Metode Penelitian Public Relations dan Komunikasi”, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2003

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 Tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): January 2024

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.